Advertisement

The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the stressor scale for emergency nurses

  • Author Footnotes
    1 The authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
    Yuxin Wang
    Footnotes
    1 The authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
    Affiliations
    Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 The authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
    Qi Zhang
    Footnotes
    1 The authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
    Affiliations
    School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Saiwen Li
    Affiliations
    School of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yi Jin
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to: Department of Nursing, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, No. 6, Jizhao Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China.
    Affiliations
    Department of Nursing, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 The authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
Published:October 31, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.005

      Abstract

      Background

      Emergency nurses are experienced specific stress factors. To evaluate stressors of emergency nurses effectively is useful to improve quality of nursing care.
      This study aimed to translate the stressor scale for emergency nurses into Chinese (C-SSEN) and carry out the reliability and validity test among Chinese emergency nurses.

      Methods

      A total of 358 emergency nurses from four hospitals in Tianjin, Henan, and Shandong province of China are recruited through a convenience sampling. The C-SSEN was translated into Chinese applying a classic ‘forward-backward’ translation method. Reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability) and validity (content validity, construct validity) were assessed.

      Results

      The final version of C-SSEN was rated by the expert panel, indicating good content validity (I-CVI ≥ 0.83, S-CVI = 0.96). The scale had satisfactory content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficient = 0.958), and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.824).

      Conclusion

      The C-SSEN is a useful and reliable scale to evaluate stressors among emergency nurses.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australasian Emergency Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Anghelescu I.G.
        • Edwards D.
        • Seifritz E.
        • Kasper S.
        Stress management and the role of Rhodiola rosea: a review.
        Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2018; 22: 242-252https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2017.1417442
        • Pacák K.
        • Palkovits M.
        Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders.
        Endocr Rev. 2001; 22: 502-548https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.22.4.0436
        • Ikeda C.
        • Saeki K.
        • Hirano M.
        [Implementation of stress assessments by occupational health nurses working in occupational health agencies and their confidence in conducting such assessments].
        Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2016; 58: 89-99https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.E15006
        • Faccio F.
        • Gandini S.
        • Renzi C.
        • Fioretti C.
        • Crico C.
        • Pravettoni G.
        Development and validation of the family resilience (FaRE) questionnaire: an observational study in Italy.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e024670https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024670
        • Dagher R.K.
        • Hofferth S.L.
        • Lee Y.
        Maternal depression, pregnancy intention, and return to paid work after childbirth.
        Women’s Health Issues. 2014; 24: e297-e303https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.002
        • Estryn-Béhar M.
        • Van der Heijden B.I.
        • Ogińska H.
        • Camerino D.
        • Le Nézet O.
        • Conway P.M.
        • Fry C.
        • Hasselhorn H.M.
        • NEXT Study G.
        The impact of social work environment, teamwork characteristics, burnout, and personal factors upon intent to leave among European nurses.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: 939-950https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806728d8
        • Keykaleh M.S.
        • Safarpour H.
        • Yousefian S.
        • et al.
        The relationship between nurse's job stress and patient safety.
        Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6: 2228-2232https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms. 2018.351
        • Mert S.
        • Aydin Sayilan A.
        • Baydemir C.
        Nurse stress scale (NSS): reliability and validity of the Turkish version.
        Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021; 57: 443-454https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12606
        • Gozum S.
        • Aksayan S.
        Guidelines for crosscultural adaptation of scales II: psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison.
        Turk J Res Dev Nurs. 2003; 5: 3-14
        • García-Sierra R.
        • Fernández-Castro J.
        • Martínez-Zaragoza F.
        Relationship between job demand and burnout in nurses: does it depend on work engagement?.
        J Nurs Manag. 2016; 24: 780-788https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12382
        • Chou H.J.
        • Tseng K.Y.
        The experience of emergency nurses caring for patients with mental illness: a qualitative study.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228540
        • Souza A.C.
        • Alexandre N.M.C.
        • Guirardello E.B.
        Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.
        Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017; 26: 649-659https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742017000300022
        • Verhaeghe R.
        • Vlerick P.
        • De Backer G.
        • Van Maele G.
        • Gemmel P.
        Recurrent changes in the work environment, job resources and distress among nurses: a comparative cross-sectional survey.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2008; 45: 382-392https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.003
        • Adriaenssens J.
        • De Gucht V.
        • Maes S.
        Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: a systematic review of 25 years of research.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52: 649-661https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.004
        • Johnston A.
        • Abraham L.
        • Greenslade J.
        • Thom O.
        • Carlstrom E.
        • Wallis M.
        • Crilly J.
        Review article: Staff perception of the emergency department working environment: integrative review of the literature.
        Emerg Med Austral. 2016; 28: 7-26https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12522
        • Wolf L.
        • Perhats C.
        • Delao A.
        • ENA Position Statement C.
        • Brim C.B.
        • Gentry J.C.
        • Leaver S.L.
        • Papa A.R.
        • Proud M.E.
        • Riwitis C.L.
        • Rogers K.S.
        • Stone E.L.
        • Uhlenbrock J.S.
        • Winger J.
        • Zaleski M.E.
        • ENA Board of Directors L.
        • Lee Gillespie G.
        • ENA Staff L.
        • Kolbuk M.E.
        Violence and its impact on the emergency nurse.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2020; 46: 354-358https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2020.01.005
        • Grover E.
        • Porter J.E.
        • Morphet J.
        An exploration of emergency nurses' perceptions, attitudes and experience of teamwork in the emergency department.
        Austral Emerg Nurs J. 2017; 20: 92-97https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2017.01.003
        • Basu S.
        • Qayyum H.
        • Mason S.
        Occupational stress in the ED: a systematic literature review.
        Emerg Med J. 2017; 34: 441-447https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-205827
        • McDermid F.
        • Judy M.
        • Peters K.
        Factors contributing to high turnover rates of emergency nurses: a review of the literature.
        Aust Crit Care. 2020; 33: 390-396https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2019.09.002
        • Gray-Toft P.
        • Anderson J.G.
        Stress among hospital nursing staff: its causes and effects.
        Soc Sci Med A. 1981; 15: 639-647https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-7123(81)90087-0
        • Porcel-Gálvez A.M.
        • Barrientos-Trigo S.
        • Bermúdez-García S.
        • Fernández-García E.
        • Bueno-Ferrán M.
        • Badanta B.
        The nursing stress scale-spanish version: an update to its psychometric properties and validation of a short-form version in acute care hospital settings.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228456
        • Teleş M.
        Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the general work stress scale.
        J Nurs Manag. 2021; 29: 710-720https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13211
        • Chen Y.C.
        • Guo Y.L.
        • Lin L.C.
        • Lee Y.J.
        • Hu P.Y.
        • Ho J.J.
        • Shiao J.S.
        Development of the nurses' occupational stressor scale.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020649
        • Campillo-Cruz M.
        • González-Gutiérrez J.L.
        • Ardoy-Cuadros J.
        • Fernández-Muñoz J.J.
        The development and exploratory psychometric properties of the traumatic and routine stressors scale on emergency nurses (TRSS-EN).
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061963
        • Yuwanich N.
        • Sandmark H.
        • Akhavan S.
        Emergency department nurses' experiences of occupational stress: a qualitative study from a public hospital in Bangkok, Thailand.
        Work. 2015; 53: 885-897https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-152181
        • Yuwanich N.
        • Akhavan S.
        • Nantsupawat W.
        • et al.
        Development and psychometric properties of the stressor scale for emergency nurses.
        Int Emerg Nurs. 2018; 39: 77-88https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj. 2018.01.005
        • Hancerlioglu S.
        • Konakci G.
        • Aykar F.S.
        Assessing psychometric properties of Turkish version of the stressor scale for emergency nurses.
        Turk J Emerg Med. 2020; 20: 69-74https://doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.285012
        • Ilgaz A.
        • Gözüm S.
        Advancing well-being and health of elderly with integrative nursing principles.
        Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg. 2019; 27: 201-210https://doi.org/10.26650/fnjn437700
        • Maneesriwongul W.
        • Dixon J.K.
        Instrument translation process: a methods review.
        J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48: 175-186https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x
        • Mokkink L.B.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Patrick D.L.
        • Alonso J.
        • Stratford P.W.
        • Knol D.L.
        • Bouter L.M.
        • de Vet H.C.
        The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.
        Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 539-549https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
        • Tavakol M.
        • Dennick R.
        Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
        Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2: 53-55https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
        • Koo T.K.
        • Li M.Y.
        A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
        • Gambashidze N.
        • Hammer A.
        • Brösterhaus M.
        • Manser T.
        • WorkSafeMed C.
        Evaluation of psychometric properties of the German hospital survey on patient safety culture and its potential for cross-cultural comparisons: a cross-sectional study.
        BMJ Open. 2017; 7e018366https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018366
        • Alexandre N.M.
        • Coluci M.Z.
        Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments.
        Cien Saude Colet. 2011; 16: 3061-3068https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-81232011000800006
        • Grant J.S.
        • Davis L.L.
        Selection and use of content experts for instrument development.
        Res Nurs Health. 1997; 20: 269-274https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<269::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g
        • Chung B.T.
        • Morris S.F.
        Confirmatory factor analysis of the Michigan hand questionnaire.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 74: 176-181https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182956659
        • Jiang H.
        • Zhang S.
        • Ding Y.
        • Li Y.
        • Zhang T.
        • Liu W.
        • Fan Y.
        • Li Y.
        • Zhang R.
        • Ma X.
        Development and validation of college students' tuberculosis knowledge, attitudes and practices questionnaire (CS-TBKAPQ).
        BMC Public Health. 2017; 17: 949https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4960-x
        • Rattray J.
        • Jones M.C.
        Essential elements of questionnaire design and development.
        J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16: 234-243https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
        • Lee S.A.
        • Mathis A.A.
        • Jobe M.C.
        • Pappalardo E.A.
        Clinically significant fear and anxiety of COVID-19: a psychometric examination of the coronavirus anxiety scale.
        Psychiatry Res. 2020; 290113112https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113112
        • Kline R.B.
        Latent variable path analysis in clinical research: a beginner's tour guide.
        J Clin Psychol. 1991; 47: 471-484https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<471::aid-jclp2270470402>3. 0.co;2-o
        • Augusto F.D.S.
        • Blanes L.
        • Nicodemo D.
        • Ferreira L.M.
        Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Cardiff wound impact schedule to Brazilian Portuguese.
        J Tissue Viability. 2017; 26: 113-118https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2016.12.002
        • Kang H.
        A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity.
        J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013; 43: 587-594https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
        • Bayri Bingol F.
        • Bal M.D.
        • Aydin Ozkan S.
        • Zengin O.
        • Civ B.
        The adaptation of the postpartum-specific anxiety scale into the Turkish language.
        J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021; 39 (https://doi.10.1080/ 02646838.2019.1705265): 86-99
        • Hair J.F.
        • Black W.C.
        • Babin B.J.
        • Anderson R.E.
        Multivariate Data Analysis: A Gloal.
        Perspective. seventh ed. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ2010