Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

A conceptual framework for the exploration of the relationship between systems of paramedicine and system performance

  • Timothy Makrides
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
    Affiliations
    Department of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

    British Columbia Emergency Health Services, Vancouver, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Linda Ross
    Affiliations
    Department of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Cameron Gosling
    Affiliations
    Department of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Peter O’Meara
    Affiliations
    Department of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 12, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2022.09.004

      Abstract

      Background

      Over the past 60 years since its inception, the Anglo-American Paramedic System has continued to grow and evolve. While brief and fragmented accounts of the differences between systems have been noted in the literature, until recently there has been a paucity of research that explores and identifies sub-models of paramedicine within the Anglo-American Paramedic System.

      Objectives

      This article describes a conceptual framework that sets a roadmap for defining and comparing two newly identified sub-models of the Anglo-American Paramedic System.

      Methods

      A conceptual framework for the exploration of these novel sub-models was developed on the basis of the work completed by Donabedian as well as Turncock and Handler. These two sub-models worked to develop a model for quality assessment and performance measurement in the public health system.

      Results

      The conceptual framework consists of six components that are strongly related to each other: system design, macro context, mission and purpose, structure, service delivery models and quality outcome measures. While this framework relates specifically to two novel paramedic systems known as the Professionally Autonomous an Directive paramedic systems, it can be used to measure any integrated health model.

      Conclusion

      The conceptual framework described in this paper provides a stepwise roadmap for the definition and comparison of the newly identified paramedic systems to better inform future research that defines and compares paramedic system design and performance.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australasian Emergency Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Levy M.
        • Gallagher J.M.
        Medical oversight of EMS systems.
        Emerg Med Serv. 2021; : 1-15
      1. National Academy of Sciences. Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1966.

      2. Makrides T., Ross L., Gosling C., Acker J., O’Meara P. From stretcher bearer to practitioner: A brief narrative review of the history of the Anglo-American paramedic system. Australasian Emergency Care.

        • Williams B.
        • Beovich B.
        • Olaussen A.
        The definition of paramedicine: an international delphi study.
        J Multidiscip Health. 2021; 14: 3561-3570
        • Dick W.
        Anglo-American vs. Franco-German emergency medical services system.
        Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003; 18: 29-35
        • O'Meara P.
        • Duthie S.
        Paramedicine in Australia and New Zealand: a comparative overview.
        Aust J Rural Health. 2018; 26: 363-368
        • O’Meara P.
        • Wingrove G.
        • McKeage M.
        Self-regulation and medical direction.
        Int J Health Gov. 2018; 23: 233-242
        • O’Meara P.
        • Wingrove G.
        • Nolan M.
        Clinical leadership in paramedic services: a narrative synthesis.
        Int J Health Gov. 2017; 22: 251-268
      3. Makrides T., Ross L., Gosling C., Acker J., O'Meara P. Exploring the structure and characteristics of the Anglo-American paramedic system in developed countries: a scoping review. International Journal of Emergency Services. 2021.

      4. Paramedic Chiefs of Canada. EMS White Paper 2021.

        • Leggio W.J.
        • Neeley King K.
        • Gienapp A.
        • Bergsten D.
        • Yu Y.
        • Gausche-Hill M.
        Executive summary of educational content from EMS agenda 2050.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019; 23: 708-711
        • Delbridge T.R.
        • Bailey B.
        • Chew J.L.
        • Conn A.K.T.
        • Krakeel J.J.
        • Manz D.
        • et al.
        Ems agenda for the future: Where we are … where we want to be.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 1998; 2: 1-12
      5. {C}{C}{C}{C}Wankhade{C} {C}P.{C}{C}, {C}{C}Mackway-Jones{C} {C}K.{C}{C}{C}{C}, editors. Ambulance services: leadership and management perspectives2015.

        • O’Meara P.
        • Wingrove G.
        • McKeage M.
        Self-regulation and medical direction: conflicted approaches to monitoring and improving the quality of clinical care in paramedic services.
        Int J Health Gov. 2018; 23: 233-242
        • Makrides T.
        • Ross L.
        • Gossling C.
        • O'Meara P.
        The structure and characteristics of Anglo-American paramedic systems in developed countries: a scoping review protocol.
        Australas J Paramed. 2020; 17
      6. Makrides T., Ross L., Gossling C., O'Meara P. Exploring the leadership structures and characteristics of Anglo-American paramedic systems in developed countries: A scoping review. 2021.

        • Varpio L.
        • Paradis E.
        • Uijtdehaage S.
        • Young M.
        The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95
        • Herepath A.
        • Kitchener M.
        • Waring J.
        A realist analysis of hospital patient safety in Wales: applied learning for alternative contexts from a multisite case study.
        Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015; 3: 1-242
        • Donabedian A.
        Quality assessment and monitoring: retrospect and prospect.
        Eval Health Prof. 1983; 6: 363-375
        • Turnock B.J.
        • Handler A.S.
        From measuring to improving public health practice.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 1997; 18: 261-282
        • Greatorex J.
        • Dexter T.
        An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study.
        J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32: 1016-1024
        • First S.
        • Tomlins L.
        • Swinburn A.
        From trade to profession--the professionalisation of the paramedic workforce.
        J Paramed Pract. 2012; 4: 378-381
        • Nelson S.
        • Turnbull J.
        • Bainbridge L.
        • Caufield T.
        • Hudon G.
        • Kendel D.
        Optimizing scopes of practice: new models of care for a new health care system.
        Ont: Can Acad Health Sci. 2014;
        • Handler A.
        • Issel M.
        • Turnock B.
        A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system.
        Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 1235-1239
      7. Reed B., Cowin L., O'Meara P., Wilson I. Professionalism and professionalisation in the discipline of paramedicine. 2019. 2019;16.

      8. W.F. Dick, Anglo-American vs. Franco-German emergency medical services system Prehosp Disaster Med: J Natl Assoc EMS Physicians World Assoc Emerg Disaster Med Assoc Acute Care Found 18 1 2003 29 35.

      9. Brightwell R., Lord B., Sim M., Maguire B., Holmes L. Standards and quality indicators for best practice in paramedic and inter-professional experiential practica. 2015.

        • Pap R.
        • Lockwood C.
        • Stephenson M.
        • Simpson P.
        Indicators to measure prehospital care quality: a scoping review.
        JBI Evid Synth. 2018; 16