Advertisement

Implementation evaluation of pre-hospital blood collection in regional Australia: a mixed methods study

Published:September 24, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2020.08.007

      Abstract

      Background

      In response to increasing emergency department presentations and wait times in Australia, multiple strategies and models of care have been implemented with varying results. One effective strategy has been the implementation of pre-hospital blood collection by paramedics when they insert an intravenous cannula. This research aims to determine the efficiency of and barriers to wider implementation of a pre-hospital blood collection trial in a regional context. In particular, to evaluate the impact of the pre-hospital blood collection on time to pathology results and error rates, and paramedic opinion.

      Methods

      This retrospective controlled cohort study was conducted over 12 months from August 2018. Emergency and pathology data were used to determine the haemolysis and error rates, as well as the time to result availability of pre-hospital blood collection samples compared to in hospital samples arrived by ambulance. To determine the facilitators and barriers to wider implementation a survey of 48 paramedics was conducted following completion of the 12-month trial. The survey was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, a behavior change theory associated with improved uptake when applied.

      Findings

      Overall 237 samples were collected. There was a 65% (51 min) reduction in time taken for samples to be received at pathology and a 38% (50 min) improvement in time taken for results to return from pathology for patients arrived by ambulance. There were no labelling errors in the pre-hospital blood collection group or change in haemolysis rates. The majority (79%) of paramedics who completed the survey were optimistic about the protocol improving patient outcomes and 89% regarded the change in practice as acceptable. Three main themes emerged: 1. Training, environmental challenges and adequate equipment; 2. increased efficiency and improved patient care and 3. Prerequisites to implementing a new practice. Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative data resulted in 10 key influencers of behavior that need to be addressed in any future implementation.

      Conclusion and implications for practice

      The introduction of pre-hospital phlebotomy reduced the time to blood results availability by 38% and resulted in fewer labelling errors. Wider implementation is supported by paramedics, but more training is required.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Australasian Emergency Care
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
        Emergency department care 2018-19. Canberra.
        2020
        • Staib A.
        • Sullivan C.
        • Griffin B.
        • Bell A.
        • Scott I.
        Report on the 4-h rule and National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) in Australia: time to review.
        Aust Health Rev. 2016; 40: 319-323
        • Morley C.
        • Unwin M.
        • Peterson G.M.
        • Stankovich J.
        • Kinsman L.
        Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13e0203316
        • Cornes M.P.
        • Danks G.
        • Elgaddal S.
        • et al.
        Early availability of laboratory results increases same day ward discharge rates.
        Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018; 56: 1864-1869
        • Naidoo N.
        • Zalgaonker M.
        • Christopher L.
        Pre-Hospital Phlebotomy and Point of Care Testing: relevance and implications for professional emergency care practice.
        Medical Technology SA. 2013; 27: 40
        • Prottengeier J.
        • Jess N.
        • Harig F.
        • Gall C.
        • Schmidt J.
        • Birkholz T.
        Can we rely on out-of-hospital blood samples? A prospective interventional study on the pre-analytical stability of blood samples under prehospital emergency medicine conditions.
        Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017; 25: 24
        • Harrison G.
        • Speroni K.G.
        • Dugan L.
        • Daniel M.G.
        A comparison of the quality of blood specimens drawn in the field by EMS versus specimens obtained in the emergency department.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2010; 36: 16-20
      1. O’Leary C. Fast-track blood tests mean quicker treatment. Available at:http://health.thewest.com.au/news/3281/fasttrack-blood-tests-meanquicker. Accessed 22 June, 2020. The West Australian 2016.

        • Curtis K.
        • Fry M.
        • Shaban R.Z.
        • Considine J.
        Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice.
        J Clin Nurs. 2017; 26: 862-872
        • Creswell J.
        • Piano Clark V.
        Designing and conducting mixed methods research.
        Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA2011
        • Atkins L.
        • Francis J.
        • Islam R.
        • et al.
        A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 77
        • Curtis K.
        • Van C.
        • Lam M.
        • et al.
        Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—a mixed-methods study.
        J Clin Nurs. 2017; 26: 4506-4518
        • Curtis K.
        • Munroe B.
        • Van C.
        • Elphick T.-L.
        The implementation and usability of HIRAID, a structured approach to emergency nursing assessment.
        Australas Emerg Care. 2020; 23: 62-70
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. Vol null.
        2013
        • Graneheim U.H.
        • Lundman B.
        Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.
        Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24: 105-112
        • Amemori M.
        • Korhonen T.
        • Kinnunen T.
        • Michie S.
        • Murtomaa H.
        Enhancing implementation of tobacco use prevention and cessation counselling guideline among dental providers: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
        Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 13
        • Murphy M.
        • Curtis K.
        • McCloughen A.
        Facilitators and barriers to the clinical application of teamwork skills taught in multidisciplinary simulated Trauma Team Training.
        Injury. 2019; 50: 1147-1152
        • Michie S.
        • Atkins L.
        • West R.
        The Behaviour Change Wheel: a guide to designing interventions.
        Silverback Publishing, Great Britain2014
        • Sinnott C.
        • Mercer S.W.
        • Payne R.A.
        • Duerden M.
        • Bradley C.P.
        • Byrne M.
        Improving medication management in multimorbidity: development of the MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review and DEcision Making (MY COMRADE) intervention using the behaviour change wheel.
        Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 132
        • DuCharme B.
        • Macci Bires A.
        • Montanye E.
        • et al.
        Effect of prehospital blood draws on length of stay for chest pain patients in the emergency department: a pilot study.
        Crit Care Nurs Q. 2019; 42: 208-214
        • Croskerry P.
        • Sinclair D.
        Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error?.
        CJEM. 2001; 3: 271-276
        • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
        Emergency department care 2017–18: australian hospital statistics.
        AIHW, Canberra2018